StatGardenREF. DESK
Calculators/Food/Oil to butter converter
Food

Oil to butter converter calculator

Converts a recipe quantity between cooking oil and butter using the standard baking ratio.

What this calculator does

Oil to butter converter works out converts a recipe quantity between cooking oil and butter using the standard baking ratio. Enter your own figures above and the answer updates as you type: nothing is fixed in the code, so the result reflects exactly the numbers you supply.

The formula this calculator evaluates is printed under the tool and explained below, so you can check the working by hand or reuse it in a spreadsheet.

The formula

FormulaButter = oil × 4/3; Oil = butter × 3/4 (the standard fat-to-fat baking substitution ratio)

The inputs explained

FieldWhat to enter
AmountA number. Starts at 1.
ConvertChoose from Oil to butter, Butter to oil.

Worked examples

Every figure in the tables below is produced by this page’s own calculator at build time, so the numbers and the tool always agree. Select any row to load that scenario.

How the answer changes with amount

Every other input is held at the calculator’s starting values while amount varies. Select any row to load that scenario into the calculator.

How the answer changes with amount
AmountButter neededRatio appliedNote
0.50.667 (same unit as entered)× 4/3Ratio is for liquid cooking oils; coconut oil converts at roughly 0.8 by weight instead
0.751.000 (same unit as entered)× 4/3Ratio is for liquid cooking oils; coconut oil converts at roughly 0.8 by weight instead
11.333 (same unit as entered)× 4/3Ratio is for liquid cooking oils; coconut oil converts at roughly 0.8 by weight instead
1.52.000 (same unit as entered)× 4/3Ratio is for liquid cooking oils; coconut oil converts at roughly 0.8 by weight instead
22.667 (same unit as entered)× 4/3Ratio is for liquid cooking oils; coconut oil converts at roughly 0.8 by weight instead
34.000 (same unit as entered)× 4/3Ratio is for liquid cooking oils; coconut oil converts at roughly 0.8 by weight instead